India's booming flexible office space to see Rs 7K cr IPO wave

India’s booming flexible (flex) office space sector is gearing up for a major IPO wave with five key players planning to raise over Rs 7,000 crore through initial public offerings in the next 12-18 months, according to ICRA.

This comes after one successful IPO in the space last year, underscoring the growing investor interest in the segment.

The surge in IPO activity is being driven by strong demand for flexible workspaces, which offer businesses cost-effective, scalable, and short-term leasing options.

The total supply of flex office space in India’s top six cities—Bengaluru, Delhi-NCR, Mumbai, Chennai, Hyderabad, and Pune—is projected to reach 125 million square feet (msf) by March 2027, growing at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 21-22%.

The flex workspace segment has gained popularity among startups, SMEs, and large enterprises alike, thanks to its low capex requirements and adaptable lease terms. As of December 2024, over 450 flex space operators were active in India, with the top five players commanding a 40% market share.

This rapid expansion has also drawn the attention of investors, with IPOs expected to provide these companies with the capital needed for further growth, expansion of centres, and enhanced digital capabilities.

The upcoming IPOs could reshape the sector, bringing greater transparency and corporate governance to the largely fragmented market.

Beyond IPOs, the flex space sector is expected to see continued growth, with its share in India’s total commercial office market likely to double from 5.3% in FY2020 to 12.5-13.5% by FY27.

Despite the growth, the sector faces challenges, including high lease renewal risks, competitive intensity, and exposure to economic cycles. But for now, investor appetite remains strong, and the IPO wave could mark the beginning of a new era for India’s flexible office space market.

(Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of the Economic Times)