Michael Owen has confidently stated that he was a better player than Wayne Rooney as a youngster. Owen was a teenage phenomenon at Liverpool, where he began scoring goals consistently at the age of 17.
The England striker was prolific during his early years with the Reds, where he enjoyed by far the best years of his career. Owen netted 158 goals in 297 appearances for the club over eight years and won the Ballon d’Or as a 22-year-old in 2001.
He carried that form over into international football, registering 40 goals in 89 appearances for England, a record that aids the comparison with Rooney. The Manchester United legend started out at Everton, where he burst onto the scene as an exciting and raw 16-year-old talent.
Rooney earned a £25million move to United as an 18-year-old and went on to become the club’s all-time record goal scorer. He also comfortably passed Owen’s tally of 150 Premier League goals, reaching 208, and his number with England, notching 53 from 120 games.
READ MORE: Pep Guardiola's warning about Jadon Sancho that Man Utd ignored
READ MORE: Liverpool news: Newcastle stars respond to Alexander Isak transfer as fresh snub comes to light
While both were undoubtedly great English strikers, the question of who was better at an early age has been raised on social media. Match of the Day posed the question on X: “Who was the better player at the age of 17, Michael Owen or Wayne Rooney?”
Owen replied: “At 17 I scored 18 PL goals (winning the Golden Boot), Wazza scored 6. At 18 I again scored 18 goals (again winning the Golden Boot and coming 4th in The Ballon d’Or), Wazza scored 9. In our opening 7 seasons, Wazza didn’t outscore me once (117 goals v 80).
“In which time I became the 2nd youngest Ballon d’Or winner ever. Injuries hindered me from then on while he sustained his level. Therefore, he’ll go down as a better player than me. But, at 17, please……”
Owen went on to join Real Madrid in 2004, but only spent one year in Spain, with injuries later impacting his career, which took him to Newcastle, United and Stoke. He expanded on his assessment of his career on this week.
“Was there another 18-year-old who was near me at 18? I was light years clear of anything in my age group – anything and probably anything around my age group in England,” he said.
“I got into the Liverpool team and won the Golden Boot at 17. Forget all the achievements, there will never ever be a two-time Golden Boot winner as a 17-year-old and 18-year-old in the Premier League.”
He added: “I sort of split my career into two: almost Liverpool and maybe Madrid, and then afterwards, because I just wasn't the same. Not that I didn't like it – I loved it at United. I love you (Rio) and the lads and whatever.
“But I'm not me. I'm not me. You know what I was when I was 18, and you know what I was when I was 30. It's like, I was half-embarrassed. I'm coming out to these big stadiums, St James' Park, Old Trafford, with my name on my back.
“It's like, can I not just change my name and just think of something, like call me something else? I don't want people to remember me like this. [I was] still good, still scoring, but I'm not what I was. It's killing me. But it's like, what can you do?”
Join our new WhatsApp community and receive your daily dose of Mirror Football content. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice.
You may also like
Vice presidential elections: Jailed Baramulla MP Engineer Rashid moves Delhi court; seeks approval to vote
Moto GP: Alex Marquez stuns with lap record pole at Catalan Grand Prix
K'taka govt searching for caste within religion, says BJP on caste census
Bihar SIR farce S2E1: ECI says 'no complaints received'
WBSSC to use unique security feature in question paper in teacher recruitment exam: Chairman