More than seven decades after gaining independence together in 1947, India and Pakistan have taken sharply divergent economic paths, with one of the starkest contrasts visible in their foreign exchange reserves — a key indicator of financial stability and economic resilience.
According to a detailed analysis by The Economic Times (ET), India’s forex reserves currently stand at over $688 billion, while Pakistan’s reserves have barely crossed $15 billion. This massive gap highlights decades of different policy choices, governance structures, and economic strategies pursued by the two countries.
At the time of independence, both nations inherited a weak economic structure with limited reserves, a by-product of colonial rule. For India, progress remained slow until the 1991 balance of payments crisis, when reserves fell below $2 billion — insufficient to fund even three weeks of imports. However, that crisis triggered sweeping economic liberalization, which included devaluation of the rupee, reduced trade barriers, and opening up to foreign investment. These reforms laid the foundation for steady growth in reserves.
Over the following decades, India’s services sector boomed, fuelled by an IT revolution, strong remittance inflows, and consistent foreign investment. By 2008, India’s reserves surpassed $300 billion, and even amid global crises like the 2008 financial meltdown and the COVID-19 pandemic, the country managed to maintain a robust external balance. As of 2025, the reserves have reached an all-time high of $688 billion, acting as a solid buffer in times of global uncertainty.
In contrast, Pakistan’s economic trajectory has been marred by volatility. Despite early industrial promise in the 1960s, recurring political instability, military interventions, and inconsistent policy directions prevented sustainable economic growth. Over time, the country became increasingly reliant on external aid from the U.S., China, and the International Monetary Fund (IMF), without developing a diversified export base.
Pakistan’s export profile remained limited — largely focused on low-value textiles — while its dependence on imported energy and a widening current account deficit put constant pressure on reserves. Since the 1980s, Pakistan has entered over 20 IMF programs, yet structural reforms have often remained incomplete or postponed. In 2023, the country faced a critical low in reserves, dropping below $4 billion.
The reasons behind the forex divergence are rooted in deeper structural and strategic differences. India successfully diversified its economy into high-growth sectors like pharmaceuticals and technology, while Pakistan struggled to expand beyond its traditional industries. India maintained a consistent reform trajectory post-1991, regardless of political changes, while Pakistan swung between populist and austerity policies under IMF pressure.
Central bank autonomy also played a role — India's Reserve Bank maintained a focus on stability and inflation control, whereas Pakistan’s monetary policy often faced political influence. Moreover, India's ability to attract large-scale foreign direct investment (FDI) and its global diaspora’s high remittances from Western economies bolstered its forex cushion. In contrast, Pakistan’s remittance inflows were smaller and more vulnerable to Middle Eastern economic cycles.
Geopolitical strategy further widened the economic gap. India deepened economic diplomacy and trade ties globally, while Pakistan often prioritized security alliances over economic cooperation.
According to a detailed analysis by The Economic Times (ET), India’s forex reserves currently stand at over $688 billion, while Pakistan’s reserves have barely crossed $15 billion. This massive gap highlights decades of different policy choices, governance structures, and economic strategies pursued by the two countries.
At the time of independence, both nations inherited a weak economic structure with limited reserves, a by-product of colonial rule. For India, progress remained slow until the 1991 balance of payments crisis, when reserves fell below $2 billion — insufficient to fund even three weeks of imports. However, that crisis triggered sweeping economic liberalization, which included devaluation of the rupee, reduced trade barriers, and opening up to foreign investment. These reforms laid the foundation for steady growth in reserves.
Over the following decades, India’s services sector boomed, fuelled by an IT revolution, strong remittance inflows, and consistent foreign investment. By 2008, India’s reserves surpassed $300 billion, and even amid global crises like the 2008 financial meltdown and the COVID-19 pandemic, the country managed to maintain a robust external balance. As of 2025, the reserves have reached an all-time high of $688 billion, acting as a solid buffer in times of global uncertainty.
In contrast, Pakistan’s economic trajectory has been marred by volatility. Despite early industrial promise in the 1960s, recurring political instability, military interventions, and inconsistent policy directions prevented sustainable economic growth. Over time, the country became increasingly reliant on external aid from the U.S., China, and the International Monetary Fund (IMF), without developing a diversified export base.
Pakistan’s export profile remained limited — largely focused on low-value textiles — while its dependence on imported energy and a widening current account deficit put constant pressure on reserves. Since the 1980s, Pakistan has entered over 20 IMF programs, yet structural reforms have often remained incomplete or postponed. In 2023, the country faced a critical low in reserves, dropping below $4 billion.
The reasons behind the forex divergence are rooted in deeper structural and strategic differences. India successfully diversified its economy into high-growth sectors like pharmaceuticals and technology, while Pakistan struggled to expand beyond its traditional industries. India maintained a consistent reform trajectory post-1991, regardless of political changes, while Pakistan swung between populist and austerity policies under IMF pressure.
Central bank autonomy also played a role — India's Reserve Bank maintained a focus on stability and inflation control, whereas Pakistan’s monetary policy often faced political influence. Moreover, India's ability to attract large-scale foreign direct investment (FDI) and its global diaspora’s high remittances from Western economies bolstered its forex cushion. In contrast, Pakistan’s remittance inflows were smaller and more vulnerable to Middle Eastern economic cycles.
Geopolitical strategy further widened the economic gap. India deepened economic diplomacy and trade ties globally, while Pakistan often prioritized security alliances over economic cooperation.
You may also like
DUNCAN FERGUSON The humiliation of bankruptcy and the lowest moment of my life
Britain's Got Talent semi-final LIVE: Star 'fears' missing show due to health setback
Punjab slams Haryana for spreading misconceptions on water sharing
Ex-Biden official who helped clear Oppenheimer sues ex-colleague over 'false' sexual harassment claims
Seven B'deshi nationals residing in India with fake documents arrested
